mirror of
https://gitlab.science.ru.nl/mthesis-edeboone/m.internship-documentation.git
synced 2024-11-22 15:03:35 +01:00
Thesis: update radio_measurement.tex with feedback
this has further feedback from Harm
This commit is contained in:
parent
26295dc5ba
commit
22cca66e83
1 changed files with 39 additions and 42 deletions
|
@ -30,34 +30,35 @@ The $n$-th sample in this waveform is then associated with a time $t[n] = t[0] +
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Filtering before ADC
|
% Filtering before ADC
|
||||||
The finite sampling rate of the waveform means that very high frequencies are not observed by the \gls{ADC}.
|
The sampling is limited by the \gls{ADC}'s Nyquist frequency at half its sampling rate.
|
||||||
However, frequencies just at or above half of sampling rate will affect the sampling itself and appear in the waveform at lower frequencies as aliases.
|
For frequencies at or above this Nyquist frequency, the \gls{ADC} records aliases that appear as lower frequencies in the waveform.
|
||||||
This frequency at half the sampling rate is known as the Nyquist frequency.
|
|
||||||
To prevent such aliases, these frequencies must be removed by a filter before sampling.
|
To prevent such aliases, these frequencies must be removed by a filter before sampling.
|
||||||
\Todo{explaind Nyquist}
|
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
For air shower radio detection, very low frequencies are also not of interest.
|
For air shower radio detection, very low frequencies are also not of interest.
|
||||||
Therefore, this filter is generally a bandpass filter.
|
Therefore, this filter is generally a bandpass filter.
|
||||||
For example, in \gls{AERA} and AugerPrime's RD the filter attenuates all of the signal except for the frequency interval between $30 \text{--} 80\MHz$.\Todo{citation?}
|
For example, in \gls{AERA} and AugerPrime's RD\Todo{RD name} the filter attenuates all of the signal except for the frequency interval between $30 \text{--} 80\MHz$.\Todo{citation?}
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
In addition to a bandpass filter, more complex filter setups are used to remove unwanted components or introduce attenuation at specific frequencies.
|
In addition to a bandpass filter, more complex filter setups are used to remove unwanted components or introduce attenuation at specific frequencies.
|
||||||
For example, in \gls{GRAND} notch filters are introduced to suppress radio signals in the FM-radio band which lies in its $20 \text{--} 200\MHz$ band.\Todo{citation?}
|
For example, in \gls{GRAND}, the total frequency band ranges from $20\MHz$ to $200\MHz$
|
||||||
|
such that the FM broadcast band ($87.5\MHz \text{--} 108\MHz$) falls within this range.
|
||||||
|
Therefore, notch filters have been introduced to suppress signals in this band.
|
||||||
|
\Todo{citation?}
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Filter and Antenna response
|
% Filter and Antenna response
|
||||||
From the above it is clear that the digitised waveform is a measurement of the electric field that is sequentially convoluted by the antenna's and filter's response.
|
From the above it is clear that the digitised waveform is a measurement of the electric field that is sequentially convolved with the antenna's and filter's response.
|
||||||
Thus to reconstruct properties of the electric field signal from the waveform, both responses must be known.
|
Thus to reconstruct properties of the electric field signal from the waveform, both responses must be known.
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Analysis, properties, frequencies, pulse detection, shape matching,
|
% Analysis, properties, frequencies, pulse detection, shape matching,
|
||||||
\bigskip
|
Different methods are available for the analysis of the waveform and the antenna and filter responses.
|
||||||
Different methods are available for the analysis of the waveform, and the antenna and filter responses.
|
|
||||||
A key aspect is determining the frequency-dependent amplitudes (and phases) in the measurements to characterise the responses and, more importantly, select signals from background.
|
A key aspect is determining the frequency-dependent amplitudes (and phases) in the measurements to characterise the responses and, more importantly, select signals from background.
|
||||||
With \acrlong{FT}s these frequency spectra can be produced.
|
With \acrlong{FT}s these frequency spectra can be produced.
|
||||||
This technique is especially important for the sinewave beacon of Section~\ref{sec:beacon:sine}, as it forms the basis of the phase measurement.
|
This technique is especially important for the sinewave beacon of Section~\ref{sec:beacon:sine}, as it forms the basis of the phase measurement.
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
The detection and identification of more complex time-domain signals can be achieved using the cross correlation,
|
The detection and identification of more complex time-domain signals can be achieved using the cross correlation,
|
||||||
which is the basis for the pulsed beacon method of Section~\ref{sec:beacon:pulse}.
|
which is the basis for the pulsed beacon method of Section~\ref{sec:beacon:pulse}.
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%\section{Analysis Methods}% <<<
|
%\section{Analysis Methods}% <<<
|
||||||
%\label{sec:waveform:analysis}
|
%\label{sec:waveform:analysis}
|
||||||
|
@ -93,8 +94,6 @@ Note the factor $2$ in this definition of the amplitude.
|
||||||
It is introduced to compensate for expecting a real valued input signal $x(t) \in \mathcal{R}$ and mapping negative frequencies to their positive equivalents.
|
It is introduced to compensate for expecting a real valued input signal $x(t) \in \mathcal{R}$ and mapping negative frequencies to their positive equivalents.
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\bigskip
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
When $x(t)$ is sampled at discrete times, the integral of \eqref{eq:fourier} is discretized in time to result in the \gls{DTFT}:
|
When $x(t)$ is sampled at discrete times, the integral of \eqref{eq:fourier} is discretized in time to result in the \gls{DTFT}:
|
||||||
\begin{equation}
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
%\tag{DTFT}
|
%\tag{DTFT}
|
||||||
|
@ -109,7 +108,7 @@ Considering a finite sampling size $N$ and periodicity of the signal, the bounds
|
||||||
It follows that the lowest resolvable frequency is $f_\mathrm{lower} = 1/T = 1/(t_{N-1} - t[0])$.
|
It follows that the lowest resolvable frequency is $f_\mathrm{lower} = 1/T = 1/(t_{N-1} - t[0])$.
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
Additionally, when the sampling of $x(t)$ is equally spaced, the $t[n]$ terms can be written as a sequence, $t[n] - t[0] = n \Delta t = n/f_s$, with $f_s$ the sampling frequency.
|
Additionally, when the sampling of $x(t)$ is equally spaced, the $t[n]$ terms can be written as a sequence, $t[n] - t[0] = n \Delta t = n/f_s$, with $f_s$ the sampling frequency.
|
||||||
Here the highest resolvable frequency is limited by the Nyquist~frequency at $f_\mathrm{nyquist} = f_s/2$.
|
Here the highest resolvable frequency is limited by the Nyquist~frequency.
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% DFT sampling of DTFT / efficient multifrequency FFT
|
% DFT sampling of DTFT / efficient multifrequency FFT
|
||||||
|
@ -132,13 +131,13 @@ When computing this transform for all integer $0 \leq k < N$, this amounts to $\
|
||||||
%For integer $0 \leq k < N $, efficient algorithms exist that derive all $X( 0 \leq k < N )$ in $\mathcal{O}( N \log N )$ calculations instead of $\mathcal{O}(kcalled \acrlong{FFT}s, sampling a subset of the frequencies.\Todo{citation?}
|
%For integer $0 \leq k < N $, efficient algorithms exist that derive all $X( 0 \leq k < N )$ in $\mathcal{O}( N \log N )$ calculations instead of $\mathcal{O}(kcalled \acrlong{FFT}s, sampling a subset of the frequencies.\Todo{citation?}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure}
|
\begin{figure}
|
||||||
\begin{subfigure}{0.45\textwidth}
|
\begin{subfigure}{0.49\textwidth}
|
||||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{methods/fourier/waveform.pdf}%
|
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{methods/fourier/waveforms.pdf}%
|
||||||
%\caption{}
|
%\caption{}
|
||||||
\end{subfigure}
|
\end{subfigure}
|
||||||
\hfill
|
\hfill
|
||||||
\begin{subfigure}{0.45\textwidth}
|
\begin{subfigure}{0.49\textwidth}
|
||||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{methods/fourier/noisy_spectrum.pdf}%
|
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{methods/fourier/spectrum.pdf}%
|
||||||
\label{fig:fourier:dtft_dft}
|
\label{fig:fourier:dtft_dft}
|
||||||
%\caption{}
|
%\caption{}
|
||||||
\end{subfigure}
|
\end{subfigure}
|
||||||
|
@ -148,13 +147,11 @@ When computing this transform for all integer $0 \leq k < N$, this amounts to $\
|
||||||
The frequency spectrum of the waveform.
|
The frequency spectrum of the waveform.
|
||||||
Comparison of the \gls{DTFT} and \gls{DFT} of the same waveform.
|
Comparison of the \gls{DTFT} and \gls{DFT} of the same waveform.
|
||||||
The \gls{DFT} can be interpreted as sampling the \gls{DTFT} at integer multiple of the waveform's sampling rate $f_s$.
|
The \gls{DFT} can be interpreted as sampling the \gls{DTFT} at integer multiple of the waveform's sampling rate $f_s$.
|
||||||
\Todo{Larger labels, fix spectrum plot, freq label, dot markers in DFT, mention in text}
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
\label{fig:fourier}
|
\label{fig:fourier}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\bigskip
|
|
||||||
% Linearity fourier for real/imag
|
% Linearity fourier for real/imag
|
||||||
In the previous equations, the resultant quantity $X(f)$ is a complex amplitude.
|
In the previous equations, the resultant quantity $X(f)$ is a complex amplitude.
|
||||||
Since a complex plane wave can be linearly decomposed as
|
Since a complex plane wave can be linearly decomposed as
|
||||||
|
@ -213,15 +210,21 @@ Likewise, the complex phase at a given frequency $\pTrue(f)$ is obtained by
|
||||||
Applying \eqref{eq:fourier:dtft_decomposed} to a signal $x(t) = A\cos(2\pi t f + \pTrue)$ with the above definitions obtains
|
Applying \eqref{eq:fourier:dtft_decomposed} to a signal $x(t) = A\cos(2\pi t f + \pTrue)$ with the above definitions obtains
|
||||||
an amplitude $A$ and phase $\pTrue$ at frequency $f$.
|
an amplitude $A$ and phase $\pTrue$ at frequency $f$.
|
||||||
When the minus sign in the exponent of \eqref{eq:fourier} is not taken into account, the calculated phase in \eqref{eq:complex_phase} will have an extra minus sign.
|
When the minus sign in the exponent of \eqref{eq:fourier} is not taken into account, the calculated phase in \eqref{eq:complex_phase} will have an extra minus sign.
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Figure~\ref{fig:fourier} shows the frequency spectrum of a simulated waveform that is obtained using either a \gls{DFT} or a \gls{DTFT}.
|
||||||
|
It shows that the \gls{DFT} evaluates the \gls{DTFT} only at certain frequencies.
|
||||||
|
By missing the correct frequency bin for the sine wave, it estimates a too low amplitude for the sine wave.
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\bigskip
|
|
||||||
% % Static sin/cos terms if f_s, f and N static ..
|
% % Static sin/cos terms if f_s, f and N static ..
|
||||||
When calculating the \gls{DTFT} for multiple inputs which share both an equal number of samples $N$ and equal sampling frequencies $f_s$, the $\sin$ and $\cos$ terms in \eqref{eq:fourier:dtft_decomposed} are the same for a single frequency $f$ upto an overall phase which is dependent on $t[0]$.
|
When calculating the \gls{DTFT} for multiple inputs which share both an equal number of samples $N$ and equal sampling frequencies $f_s$, the $\sin$ and $\cos$ terms in \eqref{eq:fourier:dtft_decomposed} are the same for a single frequency $f$ upto an overall phase which is dependent on $t[0]$.
|
||||||
Therefore, at the cost of an increased memory allocation, these terms can be precomputed, reducing the number of real multiplications to $2N+1$, with the additional\Todo{finish}.
|
Therefore, at the cost of an increased memory allocation, these terms can be precomputed, reducing the number of real multiplications to $2N+1$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% .. relevance to hardware if static frequency
|
% .. relevance to hardware if static frequency
|
||||||
Thus, for static frequencies in a continuous beacon, the coefficients for evaluating the \gls{DTFT} can be put into the hardware of the detectors,
|
Thus, for static frequencies in a continuous beacon, the coefficients for evaluating the \gls{DTFT} can be put into the hardware of the detectors,
|
||||||
opening the way to efficiently measuring the phases in realtime.\Todo{figure?}
|
opening the way to efficiently measuring the phases in realtime.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% >>>>
|
% >>>>
|
||||||
|
@ -242,8 +245,9 @@ It is defined as
|
||||||
where the integral reduces to a sum for a finite amount of samples in either $u(t)$ or $v(t)$.
|
where the integral reduces to a sum for a finite amount of samples in either $u(t)$ or $v(t)$.
|
||||||
Still, $\tau$ remains a continuous variable.
|
Still, $\tau$ remains a continuous variable.
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
|
% Figure example of correlation and argmax
|
||||||
\bigskip
|
Figure~\ref{fig:correlation} illustrates how the best time delay $\tau$ between two waveforms can thus be found by finding the maximum cross-correlation.
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Discrete \tau because of sampling
|
% Discrete \tau because of sampling
|
||||||
In reality, both waveforms have a finite size, also reducing the time delay $\tau$ resolution to the highest sampling rate of the two waveforms.
|
In reality, both waveforms have a finite size, also reducing the time delay $\tau$ resolution to the highest sampling rate of the two waveforms.
|
||||||
|
@ -251,16 +255,13 @@ When the sampling rates are equal, the time delay variable is effectively shifti
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
% Upsampling? No
|
% Upsampling? No
|
||||||
Techniques such as upsampling or interpolation can be used to effectively change the sampling rate of a waveform up to a certain degree.
|
Techniques such as upsampling or interpolation can be used to effectively change the sampling rate of a waveform up to a certain degree.
|
||||||
However, for the purpose in this document, these methods are not used.
|
However, for the purposes in this document, these methods are not used.
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Approaching analog \tau; or zero-stuffing
|
% Approaching analog \tau; or zero-stuffing
|
||||||
Since zero-valued samples do not contribute to the integral of \eqref{eq:correlation_cont}, they can be freely added (or ignored) to a waveform when performing the calculations.
|
Since zero-valued samples do not contribute to the integral of \eqref{eq:correlation_cont}, they can be freely added (or ignored) to a waveform when performing the calculations.
|
||||||
This means two waveforms of different sampling rates can be correlated when the sampling rates are integer multiples of each other, simply by zero-stuffing the slowly sampled waveform.
|
This means two waveforms of different sampling rates can be correlated when the sampling rates are integer multiples of each other, simply by zero-stuffing the slowly sampled waveform.
|
||||||
This allows for approximating an analog time delay between two waveforms when one waveform is sampled at a very high rate as compared to the other.
|
This allows to approximate an analog time delay between two waveforms when one waveform is sampled at a very high rate as compared to the other.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\Todo{resolution 1/sqrt(12)?}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure}
|
\begin{figure}
|
||||||
\centering
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
@ -280,19 +281,16 @@ This allows for approximating an analog time delay between two waveforms when on
|
||||||
\label{subfig:correlation}
|
\label{subfig:correlation}
|
||||||
\end{subfigure}%
|
\end{subfigure}%
|
||||||
\caption{
|
\caption{
|
||||||
\textit{Left:} Two waveforms to be correlated.
|
\textit{Left:} Two waveforms to be correlated with the second waveform delayed by $5$.
|
||||||
\textit{Right:} The correlation of both waveforms as a function of the time delay $\tau$.
|
\textit{Right:} The correlation of both waveforms as a function of the time delay $\tau$.
|
||||||
Here the best time delay (red dashed line) is found at $5$, which would align the maximum amplitudes of both waveforms in the left pane.
|
Here the best time delay (red dashed line) is found at $5$, which would align the maximum amplitudes of both waveforms in the left pane.
|
||||||
\Todo{mention in text}
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
\label{fig:correlation}
|
\label{fig:correlation}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% >>>
|
% >>>
|
||||||
\section{Hilbert Transform}% <<<<
|
\section{Hilbert Transform}% <<<<
|
||||||
|
The analytic signal $s_a(t)$ of a waveform $x(t)$ can be obtained using the Hilbert Transform through
|
||||||
A variation of the Fourier Transform of Section~\ref{sec:fourier} is the Hilbert Transform.\Todo{rephrase as standalone tool}
|
|
||||||
With it, the analytic signal $s_a(t)$ of a waveform $x(t)$ can be obtained through
|
|
||||||
\begin{equation}
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
\label{eq:analytic_signal}
|
\label{eq:analytic_signal}
|
||||||
\phantom{,}
|
\phantom{,}
|
||||||
|
@ -300,21 +298,20 @@ With it, the analytic signal $s_a(t)$ of a waveform $x(t)$ can be obtained throu
|
||||||
,
|
,
|
||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
where $\hat{x}(t)$ is the Hilbert Transformed waveform.
|
where $\hat{x}(t)$ is the Hilbert Transformed waveform.
|
||||||
|
The Hilbert Transform corresponds to a \gls{FT} where positive frequencies are phase-shifted by $-\pi/2$ and negative frequencies are phase-shifted by $+\pi/2$.
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The Hilbert Transform corresponds to a \gls{FT} where positive frequencies $f > 0$ are phase-shifted by $-\pi/2$ and negative frequencies are phase-shifted by $+\pi/2$.
|
The analytic signal allows to estimate the overall maximum amplitude of a signal irrespective of sign by determining its envelope.
|
||||||
|
In Figure~\ref{fig:hilbert_transform}, the envelope of a signal is used to find the time of the maximum amplitude.
|
||||||
|
Such a mechanism might be used for timing instead of the cross-correlation described in the previous Section.
|
||||||
\bigskip
|
\\
|
||||||
The envelope of a waveform $x(t)$ is determined by taking the absolute value of its analytic signal $s_a(t)$.
|
|
||||||
Figure~\ref{fig:hilbert_transform} shows an envelope with its original waveform.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure}
|
\begin{figure}
|
||||||
\centering
|
\centering
|
||||||
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{pulse/hilbert_timing_interpolation_template.pdf}
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{pulse/hilbert_timing_interpolation_template.pdf}
|
||||||
\caption{
|
\caption{
|
||||||
Timing information from the maximum amplitude of the envelope.
|
Timing information from the maximum amplitude of the envelope.
|
||||||
\Todo{noisy trace figure}
|
\protect \Todo{noisy trace figure}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
\label{fig:hilbert_transform}
|
\label{fig:hilbert_transform}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue