mirror of
https://gitlab.science.ru.nl/mthesis-edeboone/m.internship-documentation.git
synced 2024-12-23 05:23:34 +01:00
WUotD: beacon: upto \Delta t = t_phase + kT
This commit is contained in:
parent
2645030538
commit
3a974287fd
3 changed files with 112 additions and 29 deletions
|
@ -1,9 +1,87 @@
|
|||
\documentclass[../thesis.tex]{subfiles}
|
||||
\graphicspath{{.}{../../../figures/}}
|
||||
|
||||
\graphicspath{
|
||||
{.}
|
||||
{../../figures/}
|
||||
{../../../figures/}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
\chapter{Disciplining by Beacon}
|
||||
\label{sec:}
|
||||
\label{sec:disciplining}
|
||||
The main method of synchronising multiple stations is by employing a GNSS.
|
||||
This system should deliver timing with an accuracy in the order of $50\ns$.
|
||||
|
||||
As outlined in Section~\ref{sec:time:beacon}, a beacon can also be employed to synchronise the stations.
|
||||
This chapter outlines the steps required to setup a synchronisation between multiple antennae using one transmitter.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The distance between a transmitter and an antenna incurs a time delay $t_d$.
|
||||
Since the signal is an electromagnetic wave, its phase velocity $v$ depends on the refractive index~$n$ as
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:refractive_index}
|
||||
v_p = \frac{c}{n}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
with $c$ the speed of light in vacuum.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,height=\textheight,keepaspectratio]{beacon/beacon_spatial_time_difference_setup.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{
|
||||
The spatial setup of one transmitter ($T_1$) and two antennas ($A_i$) at different distances.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:beacon_spatial_setup}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
To synchronise two antennas with a common signal, the difference in these time delays must be known.
|
||||
Taking the refractive index to be constant, this is a matter of vector addition of the distances,
|
||||
resulting in
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:spatial_time_difference_simple}
|
||||
\phantom{.}
|
||||
\Delta t_{d} = t_1 - t_2 = (\vec{d_1} - \vec{d_2})/v = d_{12} / v
|
||||
.
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
||||
\bigskip
|
||||
In addition to the time delay incurred from varying distances, the local antenna clock can be skewed.
|
||||
In effect, this can be viewed as an additional time delay $t_c$.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
||||
In total, the difference in apparent arrival time of a signal is a combination of both time delays
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:total_time_difference}
|
||||
\phantom{.}
|
||||
\Delta t = t_d + t_c
|
||||
.
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
||||
\bigskip
|
||||
As mentioned in Section~\ref{sec:time:beacon}, a single beacon allows to correct the time difference of two antennas, upto an unknown multiple $k$ of its period, by measuring the phases $\phase_1$, $\phase_2$ of the beacon at both antennas, with
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:phase_diff_to_time_diff}
|
||||
\phantom{.}
|
||||
\Delta t = \Delta t_\phase + kT = \frac{\phase_1 - \phase_2}{2\pi} T + kT
|
||||
.
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
||||
In Figure~\ref{fig:beacon_outline}, both the beacon signal and a bandpassed impulsive signal is shown.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{beacon/08_beacon_sync_timing_outline.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{
|
||||
Outline for synchronising two signals containing the same beacon.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:beacon_outline}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\hrule
|
||||
\bigskip
|
||||
\hrule
|
||||
|
||||
Simulation
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
\chapter{Timing Mechanisms}
|
||||
\chapter{Time Synchronisation Mechanisms}
|
||||
\label{sec:time}
|
||||
Need reference system with better accuracy to constrain
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -82,10 +82,9 @@ This time interval has an upper limit on its size depending on the properties of
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
In Figure~\ref{fig:beacon:sine}, both sampling~1~and~2 can reconstruct the sine wave from the measurements.
|
||||
Meanwhile, the square wave has some
|
||||
Meanwhile, the square wave has some leeway on the precise timing.\todo{reword sentence}
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||
\begin{subfigure}{0.45\textwidth}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{beacon/ttl_beacon.pdf}
|
||||
|
@ -106,7 +105,7 @@ Meanwhile, the square wave has some
|
|||
\caption{
|
||||
Two different beacon signals with the same frequency.
|
||||
Both show two samplings with a small offset in time.
|
||||
Reconstructing the signal is easier to do for the sine wave.\todo{Add fourier spectra?}
|
||||
Reconstructing the signal is easier to do for the sine wave with the same samplelength and number of samples.\todo{Add fourier spectra?}
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:beacon:ttl_sine_beacon}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
@ -114,10 +113,33 @@ Meanwhile, the square wave has some
|
|||
%% Second timescale needed
|
||||
|
||||
Instead of driving the antenna, the beacon is meant to synchronise the clock of the antenna with the clock of the transmitter.
|
||||
With one oscillator, the antenna can work in phase with the transmitter, but the actual
|
||||
To do so, the signal needs to have a second timescale.
|
||||
With one oscillator, the antenna can work in phase with the transmitter, but the actual synchronization can be off by a multiple of periods.
|
||||
To be able to determine this offset, a second timescale needs to be introduced in the signal.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
||||
This slower timescale allows to count the ticks of the quicker signal.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\begin{subfigure}{0.45\textwidth}
|
||||
% \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{beacon/sine_beacon_multiple_periods_off.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{
|
||||
Two syntonised beacons.
|
||||
The actual synchronization is off by a multiple of periods.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:second_timescale:off}
|
||||
\end{subfigure}
|
||||
\hfill
|
||||
\begin{subfigure}{0.45\textwidth}
|
||||
% \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{beacon/sine_beacon_multiple_periods_off.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{
|
||||
Two syntonised beacons, the actual synchronization is off by a multiple of periods.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:second_timescale:on}
|
||||
\end{subfigure}
|
||||
\caption{
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:second_timescale}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{beacon/auger/1512.02216.figure2.beacon_beat.png}
|
||||
|
@ -129,18 +151,6 @@ To do so, the signal needs to have a second timescale.
|
|||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The phase measured is dependent on the time needed to traverse the distance between transmitter and antenna.
|
||||
As
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
In the case there are multiple antennas, distances from the transmitter to each antenna vary greatly.
|
||||
As the phase
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Fourier Transform}
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
|
@ -152,13 +162,4 @@ As the phase
|
|||
To setup a time synchronising system for airshower measurements, actually only the high frequency part of the beacon must be employed.
|
||||
The low frequency part, from which the number of oscillations of the high frequency part are counted, is supplied be the very airshower that is measured.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Since the signal is an electromagntic wave, its phase velocity $v$ depends on the refractive index~$n$ as
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:refractive_index}
|
||||
v_p = \frac{c}{n}
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
with $c$ the speed of light in vacuum.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -91,6 +91,10 @@
|
|||
|
||||
\newcommand{\MHz}{\text{MHz}}
|
||||
|
||||
% Quantities
|
||||
\newcommand{\beaconfreq}{\ensuremath{f_\mathrm{beacon}}}
|
||||
\newcommand{\phase}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% Names
|
||||
\newcommand{\PA}{Pierre~Auger}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue