mirror of
https://gitlab.science.ru.nl/mthesis-edeboone/m.internship-documentation.git
synced 2024-11-13 19:03:36 +01:00
Thesis: Intro+Conclusion: WuotD
This commit is contained in:
parent
b9b2dedbdc
commit
561b8de6dc
2 changed files with 42 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -10,5 +10,34 @@
|
||||||
\chapter{Conclusion}
|
\chapter{Conclusion}
|
||||||
\label{sec:conclusion}
|
\label{sec:conclusion}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Using radio antennas to detect \glspl{UHECR} has received much attention recently.
|
||||||
|
The \acrlong{Auger} is currently being upgraded to \gls{AugerPrime} incorporating radio detectors with scintillators and water-cherenkov detectors.
|
||||||
|
Other experiments, such as \gls{GRAND}, plan\Todo{word} to fully rely on radio detection only.
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
% Timing not enough
|
||||||
|
Time information in such large observatories is typically distributed using \glspl{GNSS}, reaching up to $10\ns$ accuracy under very good conditions.
|
||||||
|
For analysis using radio interferometry to be competitive, this timing accuracy needs to be improved towards the $1\ns$ (see Figure~\ref{fig:}).
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% Beacon introduction
|
||||||
|
A viable method to obtain this timing accuracy is to incorporate a beacon transmitter into the array.
|
||||||
|
This (narrow-band) transmitter sends out a special\Todo{word} signal that is picked up by the radio antennas in the array.
|
||||||
|
With relatively simple techniques, the timing accuracy can be improved to below $1\ns$ (see Figures~\ref{fig:},~\ref{fig:}).
|
||||||
|
Thus, at a relatively low cost, the (relative) timing of radio arrays can be improved to enable radio interferometry.
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
|
In some circumstances, an external transmitter can be used as a beacon.
|
||||||
|
For example, in \gls{Auger}, a public TV broadcaster emits its signal at $f = 62.75\MHz$ from \Todo{name} (approximately $75\;\mathrm{km}$ north-west of the array\Todo{verify}).
|
||||||
|
With the source location and the frequency known, time delays can be calculated and this signal can be used to remove\Todo{word} timing errors smaller than $T = 1/f \sim 16\ns$.
|
||||||
|
Unfortunately, with the \gls{GNSS} timing accuracy estimated in the same order of magnitude and the signal being periodic, the synchronisation of the antennas can be off by an integer amount of periods $T$.\Todo{rewrite}
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Recording an air shower, in addition to such a narrow-band beacon, might provide a method to determine the correct beacon period.
|
||||||
|
Radio interferometeric analysis of the air shower depends on the coherence of the received signals.
|
||||||
|
Any synchronicity problems in the radio antennas decrease the observed power of the reconstructed air shower.
|
||||||
|
With a limited set of periods to try\Todo{word}, this power can be maximised \Todo{word} while simultaneously determining the correct beacon period.
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{document}
|
\end{document}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ In recent and upcoming experiments, such as \gls{Auger}, \gls{GRAND} or \gls{LOF
|
||||||
With distances up to $1.5\;\mathrm{km}$ (\gls{Auger}), the detectors therefore have to operate in a self-sufficient manner\Todo{word} with only wireless communication channels.
|
With distances up to $1.5\;\mathrm{km}$ (\gls{Auger}), the detectors therefore have to operate in a self-sufficient manner\Todo{word} with only wireless communication channels.
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Standalone detectors typically receive their timing from a \gls{GNSS}.
|
These standalone detectors typically receive their timing from a \gls{GNSS}.
|
||||||
Previously, for timing of water-Cherenkov detectors, this timing accuracy was better than the resolved data\Todo{rephrase}.
|
Previously, for timing of water-Cherenkov detectors, this timing accuracy was better than the resolved data\Todo{rephrase}.
|
||||||
Even for the first analyses of radio data, this was sufficient.
|
Even for the first analyses of radio data, this was sufficient.
|
||||||
However, for advanced analyses such as radio interferometry, the timing accuracy must be improved.
|
However, for advanced analyses such as radio interferometry, the timing accuracy must be improved.
|
||||||
|
@ -195,7 +195,18 @@ However, for advanced analyses such as radio interferometry, the timing accuracy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Structure summary
|
% Structure summary
|
||||||
In this thesis, a solution to enhance the timing accuracy of air shower radio detectors is worked out\Todo{word}.
|
In this thesis, a solution to enhance the timing accuracy of air shower radio detectors is worked out\Todo{word}.
|
||||||
First, introductions to radio interferometry and waveform analysis are given in Chapters~\ref{sec:interferometry}~and~\ref{sec:waveform}.
|
First, an introduction to radio interferometry is given in Chapter~\ref{sec:interferometry}.
|
||||||
|
This will be used later on and gives an insight into the timing accuracy requirements.
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
Chapter~\ref{sec:waveform} reviews typical techniques to analyse waveforms to obtain timing information.
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
Chapter~\ref{sec:disciplining} introduces the concept of a beacon transmitter to synchronise an array of radio antennas using techniques from the preceding chapter to constrain the achievable timing accuracy.
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
Chapter~\ref{sec:single_sine_sync} shows\Todo{word} how a sine wave beacon can synchronise an array while using the radio interferometric approach to resolve\Todo{word} an airshower.
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
Finally, Chapter~\ref{sec:gnss_accuracy} investigates the limitations of the current hardware in \gls{GRAND} and its ability to record and reconstruct a beacon signal.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue