mirror of
				https://gitlab.science.ru.nl/mthesis-edeboone/m.internship-documentation.git
				synced 2025-10-26 09:46:34 +01:00 
			
		
		
		
	Thesis: feedback on radio_measurement.tex (WIP)
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									89b2ad1d10
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						6256bc249e
					
				
					 1 changed files with 20 additions and 15 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -8,14 +8,14 @@ | |||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| \begin{document} | ||||
| \chapter{Measuring with Radio Antennas} | ||||
| \chapter{Waveform Analysis Techniques} | ||||
| \label{sec:waveform} | ||||
| %Electric fields, | ||||
| %Antenna Polarizations, | ||||
| %Frequency Bandwidth, | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Radio antennas are sensitive to changes in their surrounding electric fields. | ||||
| The polarisations of the electric field that a single antenna can record is dependent on the geometry of this antenna. | ||||
| The polarisation of the electric field that a single antenna can record is dependent on the geometry of this antenna. | ||||
| Therefore, in experiments such as \gls{Auger} or \gls{GRAND}, multiple antennas (called channels) are incorporated into a single unit to obtain complementary polarisation recordings. | ||||
| Additionally, the shape and size of antennas affect how well the antenna responds to certain frequency ranges, resulting in different designs meeting different criteria. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
|  | @ -25,8 +25,8 @@ Additionally, the shape and size of antennas affect how well the antenna respond | |||
| %Waveform + Time vector, | ||||
| In each radio detector, the antenna presents its signals to an \gls{ADC} as fluctuating voltages. | ||||
| In turn, the \gls{ADC} records the analog signals with a specified samplerate $f_s$ resulting in a sequence of digitised voltages or waveform. | ||||
| The $n$-th sample in this waveform is then associated with a fixed timestamp $t[n] = t[0] + n/f_s = t[0] + n*\Delta t$ after the initial sample at $t[0]$. | ||||
| In reality, the sampling rate will vary by very small amounts resulting in timestamp inaccuracies called jitter. | ||||
| The $n$-th sample in this waveform is then associated with a time $t[n] = t[0] + n/f_s = t[0] + n\cdot\Delta t$ after the initial sample at $t[0]$. | ||||
| %In reality, the sampling rate will vary by very small amounts resulting in timestamp inaccuracies called jitter. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| % Filtering before ADC | ||||
|  | @ -34,10 +34,11 @@ The finite sampling rate of the waveform means that very high frequencies are no | |||
| However, frequencies just at or above half of sampling rate will affect the sampling itself and appear in the waveform at lower frequencies as aliases. | ||||
| This frequency at half the sampling rate is known as the Nyquist frequency. | ||||
| To prevent such aliases, these frequencies must be removed by a filter before sampling. | ||||
| \Todo{explaind Nyquist} | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| For air shower radio detection, very low frequencies are also not of interest. | ||||
| Therefore, this filter is generally a bandpass filter. | ||||
| For example, in \gls{Auger} the filter removes all of the signal except for the frequency interval between $30 \text{--} 80\MHz$.\Todo{citation?} | ||||
| For example, in \gls{AERA} and AugerPrime's RD the filter attenuates all of the signal except for the frequency interval between $30 \text{--} 80\MHz$.\Todo{citation?} | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| In addition to a bandpass filter, more complex filter setups are used to remove unwanted components or introduce attenuation at specific frequencies. | ||||
| For example, in \gls{GRAND} notch filters are introduced to suppress radio signals in the FM-radio band which lies in its $20 \text{--} 200\MHz$ band.\Todo{citation?} | ||||
|  | @ -55,14 +56,14 @@ A key aspect is determining the frequency-dependent amplitudes (and phases) in t | |||
| With \acrlong{FT}s these frequency spectra can be produced. | ||||
| This technique is especially important for the sinewave beacon of Section~\ref{sec:beacon:sine}, as it forms the basis of the phase measurement. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| The detection and identification of more complex time-domain signals can be achieved using the cross correlation\Todo{rephrase}, | ||||
| The detection and identification of more complex time-domain signals can be achieved using the cross correlation, | ||||
| which is the basis for the pulsed beacon method of Section~\ref{sec:beacon:pulse}. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| %\section{Analysis Methods}% <<< | ||||
| %\label{sec:waveform:analysis} | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| \section{Fourier Transform}% <<<< | ||||
| \section{Fourier Transforms}% <<<< | ||||
| \label{sec:fourier} | ||||
| The \gls{FT} allows for a frequency-domain representation of a time-domain signal. | ||||
| In the case of radio antennas, it converts a time-ordered sequence of voltages into a set of complex amplitudes that depend on frequency. | ||||
|  | @ -100,7 +101,7 @@ When $x(t)$ is sampled at discrete times, the integral of \eqref{eq:fourier} is | |||
| 	\label{eq:fourier:dtft} | ||||
| 	X(f) = \sum_{n=0}^{N-1}   x(t[n])\, e^{ -i 2 \pi f t[n]} | ||||
| \end{equation} | ||||
| where $x(t)$ is sampled a finite number of times $N$ at some timestamps $t[n]$. | ||||
| where $x(t)$ is sampled a finite number of times $N$ at times $t[n]$. | ||||
| Note that the amplitude $A(f)$ will now scale with the number of samples~$N$, and thus should be normalised to $A(f) = 2 \left| X(f) \right| / N$. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  | @ -142,15 +143,17 @@ When computing this transform for all integer $0 \leq k < N$, this amounts to $\ | |||
| 		%\caption{} | ||||
| 	\end{subfigure} | ||||
| 	\caption{ | ||||
| 		Left: A waveform sampling a sine wave with white noise. | ||||
| 		Right: | ||||
| 		\textit{Left:} A waveform sampling a sine wave with white noise. | ||||
| 		\textit{Right:} | ||||
| 			The frequency spectrum of the waveform. | ||||
| 			Comparison of the \gls{DTFT} and \gls{DFT} of the same waveform. | ||||
| 			The \gls{DFT} can be interpreted as sampling the \gls{DTFT} at integer multiple of the waveform's sampling rate $f_s$. | ||||
| 		\Todo{Larger labels, fix spectrum plot} | ||||
| 		\Todo{Larger labels, fix spectrum plot, freq label, dot markers in DFT, mention in text} | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| 	\label{fig:fourier} | ||||
| \end{figure} | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| \bigskip | ||||
| % Linearity fourier for real/imag | ||||
| In the previous equations, the resultant quantity $X(f)$ is a complex amplitude. | ||||
|  | @ -214,7 +217,7 @@ When the minus sign in the exponent of \eqref{eq:fourier} is not taken into acco | |||
| \bigskip | ||||
| % % Static sin/cos terms if f_s, f and N static .. | ||||
| When calculating the \gls{DTFT} for multiple inputs which share both an equal number of samples $N$ and equal sampling frequencies $f_s$, the $\sin$ and $\cos$ terms in \eqref{eq:fourier:dtft_decomposed} are the same for a single frequency $f$ upto an overall phase which is dependent on $t[0]$. | ||||
| Therefore, at the cost of an increased memory allocation, these terms can be precomputed, reducing the number of real multiplications to $2N+1$, with the additional. | ||||
| Therefore, at the cost of an increased memory allocation, these terms can be precomputed, reducing the number of real multiplications to $2N+1$, with the additional\Todo{finish}. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| % .. relevance to hardware if static frequency | ||||
| Thus, for static frequencies in a continuous beacon, the coefficients for evaluating the \gls{DTFT} can be put into the hardware of the detectors, | ||||
|  | @ -277,9 +280,10 @@ This allows for approximating an analog time delay between two waveforms when on | |||
| 		\label{subfig:correlation} | ||||
| 	\end{subfigure}% | ||||
| 	\caption{ | ||||
| 		Left: Two waveforms to be correlated. | ||||
| 		Right: The correlation of both waveforms as a function of the time delay $\tau$. | ||||
| 		\textit{Left:} Two waveforms to be correlated. | ||||
| 		\textit{Right:} The correlation of both waveforms as a function of the time delay $\tau$. | ||||
| 		Here the best time delay (red dashed line) is found at $5$, which would align the maximum amplitudes of both waveforms in the left pane. | ||||
| 		\Todo{mention in text} | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| 	\label{fig:correlation} | ||||
| \end{figure} | ||||
|  | @ -287,7 +291,7 @@ This allows for approximating an analog time delay between two waveforms when on | |||
| % >>> | ||||
| \section{Hilbert Transform}% <<<< | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| A variation of the Fourier Transform of Section~\ref{sec:fourier} is the Hilbert Transform. | ||||
| A variation of the Fourier Transform of Section~\ref{sec:fourier} is the Hilbert Transform.\Todo{rephrase as standalone tool} | ||||
| With it, the analytic signal $s_a(t)$ of a waveform $x(t)$ can be obtained through | ||||
| \begin{equation} | ||||
| 	\label{eq:analytic_signal} | ||||
|  | @ -310,6 +314,7 @@ Figure~\ref{fig:hilbert_transform} shows an envelope with its original waveform. | |||
| 	\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{pulse/hilbert_timing_interpolation_template.pdf} | ||||
| 	\caption{ | ||||
| 		Timing information from the maximum amplitude of the envelope. | ||||
| 		\Todo{noisy trace figure} | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| 	\label{fig:hilbert_transform} | ||||
| \end{figure} | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue