mirror of
https://gitlab.science.ru.nl/mthesis-edeboone/m.internship-documentation.git
synced 2024-12-22 13:03:32 +01:00
Thesis: Random writes
This commit is contained in:
parent
19d797c282
commit
7c963e83a3
4 changed files with 9 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ for which the mean is $\bar{a} = \sigma \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}$ and the standard~d
|
|||
\end{subfigure}
|
||||
\caption{
|
||||
Marginal distribution functions of the noise phasor.
|
||||
\Todo{expand captions}
|
||||
\protect \Todo{expand captions}
|
||||
Rayleigh and Rice distributions.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:noise:pdf}
|
||||
|
@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ Meanwhile, it approaches a gaussian distribution around $s$ when a strong signal
|
|||
\caption{
|
||||
A signal phasor's amplitude in the presence of noise will follow a Rician distribution.
|
||||
For strong signals, this approximates a gaussian distribution, while for weak signals, this approaches a Rayleigh distribution.
|
||||
\Todo{expand captions}
|
||||
\protect \Todo{expand captions}
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{fig:phasor_sum:pdf}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -11,7 +11,9 @@
|
|||
\chapter{Synchronising Detectors with a Beacon Signal}
|
||||
\label{sec:disciplining}
|
||||
The detection of extensive air showers uses detectors distributed over large areas. %<<<
|
||||
Solutions for precise timing ($< 0.1\ns$) over large distances exist for cabled setups, e.g.~White~Rabbit~\cite{Serrano:2009wrp}.
|
||||
Solutions for precise timing ($< 0.1\ns$) over large distances exist.
|
||||
Initially developed for fibre-optic setups, White~Rabbit~\cite{Serrano:2009wrp} is also being investigated to be used as a direct wireless time dissemination system~\cite{Gilligan:WR-over-mm-wave}.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
However, the combination of large distances and the number of detectors make it prohibitively expensive to realise such a setup for \gls{UHECR} detection.
|
||||
For this reason, the time synchronisation of these autonomous stations is typically performed with a \gls{GNSS} clock in each station.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
@ -153,7 +155,7 @@ The correct period $k$ alignment might be found in at least two ways.
|
|||
% lifting period multiplicity -> long timescale
|
||||
First, if the timescale of the beacon is much longer than the estimated accuracy of another timing mechanism (such as a \gls{GNSS}),
|
||||
one can be confident to have the correct period.
|
||||
In \gls{AERA} for example, multiple sine waves were used amounting to a total beacon period of $\sim 1 \us$\cite[Figure~2]{PierreAuger:2015aqe}.
|
||||
In \gls{AERA} for example, multiple sine waves were used amounting to a total beacon period of $\sim 1 \us$ \cite[Figure~2]{PierreAuger:2015aqe}.
|
||||
With an estimated timing accuracy of the \gls{GNSS} under $50 \ns$ the correct beacon period can be determined, resulting in a unique measured arrival time $\tMeasArriv$.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
% lifing period multiplicity -> short timescale counting +
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
|
|||
|
||||
%<<<
|
||||
Using radio antennas to detect \glspl{UHECR} has received much attention recently.
|
||||
The \acrlong{Auger} is currently being upgraded to \gls{AugerPrime} incorporating radio detectors with scintillators and water-cherenkov detectors.
|
||||
Other experiments, such as \gls{GRAND}, plan\Todo{word} to fully rely on radio detection only.
|
||||
The \acrlong{Auger} is currently being upgraded to \gls{AugerPrime} incorporating radio and scintillation detectors together with the already existing water-Cherenkov and fluorescence detectors.
|
||||
Other experiments, such as \gls{GRAND}, envision to rely only on radio measurements of an \gls{EAS}.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
% Timing not enough
|
||||
Time information in such large observatories is typically distributed using \glspl{GNSS}, reaching up to $10\ns$ accuracy under very good conditions.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ For example, in \gls{AERA} and AugerPrime's RD\Todo{RD name} the filter attenuat
|
|||
\\
|
||||
In addition to a bandpass filter, more complex filter setups are used to remove unwanted components or introduce attenuation at specific frequencies.
|
||||
For example, in \gls{GRAND}, the total frequency band ranges from $20\MHz$ to $200\MHz$
|
||||
such that the FM broadcast band ($87.5\MHz \text{--} 108\MHz$) falls within this range.
|
||||
such that the FM broadcasting band ($87.5\MHz \text{--} 108\MHz$) falls within this range.
|
||||
Therefore, notch filters have been introduced to suppress signals in this band.
|
||||
\Todo{citation?}
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue