mirror of
https://gitlab.science.ru.nl/mthesis-edeboone/m.internship-documentation.git
synced 2024-11-12 18:43:30 +01:00
thesis: beacon: introduce named variables
This commit is contained in:
parent
fb3b0ec48c
commit
acef2fa498
1 changed files with 62 additions and 42 deletions
|
@ -11,6 +11,26 @@
|
|||
% t is true time
|
||||
% priming is required for moving with the signal / different reference frame
|
||||
|
||||
% time variables
|
||||
\newcommand{\tTrue}{t}
|
||||
\newcommand{\tMeas}{\tau}
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\tTrueEmit}{\tTrue_0}
|
||||
\newcommand{\tTrueArriv}{\tTrueEmit'}
|
||||
\newcommand{\tMeasArriv}{\tMeas_0}
|
||||
\newcommand{\tProp}{\tTrue_d}
|
||||
\newcommand{\tClock}{\tTrue_c}
|
||||
|
||||
% phase variables
|
||||
\newcommand{\pTrue}{\phi}
|
||||
\newcommand{\pMeas}{\varphi}
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\pTrueEmit}{\pTrue_0}
|
||||
\newcommand{\pTrueArriv}{\pTrueArriv'}
|
||||
\newcommand{\pMeasArriv}{\pMeas}
|
||||
\newcommand{\pProp}{\pTrue_d}
|
||||
\newcommand{\pClock}{\pTrue_c}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
\chapter{Disciplining by Beacon}
|
||||
|
@ -53,7 +73,7 @@ The setup of an additional in-band synchronisation mechanism using a transmitter
|
|||
\\
|
||||
|
||||
% time delay
|
||||
The distances between the transmitter $T$ and the antennas $A_i$ incur a time delay $(t_d)_i$ caused by the finite propagation speed of the radio signal over these distances.
|
||||
The distances between the transmitter $T$ and the antennas $A_i$ incur a time delay $(\tProp)_i$ caused by the finite propagation speed of the radio signal over these distances.
|
||||
Since the signal is an electromagnetic wave, its instantanuous velocity $v$ depends solely on the refractive index~$n$ of the medium as $v = \frac{c}{n}$.
|
||||
In general, the refractive index of air is dependent on factors such as the pressure and temperature of the air the signal is passing through and the frequencies of the signal.
|
||||
However, in many cases, the refractive index can be taken constant over the trajectory to simplify models.
|
||||
|
@ -62,44 +82,44 @@ As such, the time delay due to propagation can be written as
|
|||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:propagation_delay}
|
||||
\phantom{,}
|
||||
(t_d)_i = \frac{ \left|{ \vec{\small T} - \vec{ \small A_i} }\right| }{c} n_{eff}
|
||||
(\tProp)_i = \frac{ \left|{ \vec{\small T} - \vec{ \small A_i} }\right| }{c} n_{eff}
|
||||
,
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
where $n_{eff}$ is the effective refractive index over the trajectory of the signal.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
||||
If the time of emitting the signal at the transmitter $t_0$ is known, this allows to directly synchronise the transmitter and an antenna since
|
||||
If the time of emitting the signal at the transmitter $\tTrueEmit$ is known, this allows to directly synchronise the transmitter and an antenna since
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:transmitter2antenna_t0}
|
||||
\phantom{,}
|
||||
%$
|
||||
(t'_0)_i
|
||||
(\tTrueArriv)_i
|
||||
=
|
||||
t_0 + (t_d)_i
|
||||
\tTrueEmit + (\tProp)_i
|
||||
=
|
||||
(\tau_0)_i - (t_c)_i
|
||||
(\tMeasArriv)_i - (\tClock)_i
|
||||
%$
|
||||
,
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
where $(t'_0)_i$ and $(\tau_0)_i$ are respectively the true and measured arrival time of the signal at antenna $A_i$.
|
||||
The difference between these two terms gives the clock deviation term $(t_c)_i$.
|
||||
where $(\tTrueArriv)_i$ and $(\tMeasArriv)_i$ are respectively the true and measured arrival time of the signal at antenna $A_i$.
|
||||
The difference between these two terms gives the clock deviation term $(\tClock)_i$.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
||||
% relative timing; synchronising without t0 information
|
||||
As \eqref{eq:transmitter2antenna_t0} applies for each antenna, two antennas recording the same signal from a transmitter will share the $t_0$ term.
|
||||
In that case, the differences between the true arrival times $(t'_0)_i$ and propagation delays $(t_d)_i$ of the antennas can be related as
|
||||
As \eqref{eq:transmitter2antenna_t0} applies for each antenna, two antennas recording the same signal from a transmitter will share the $\tTrueEmit$ term.
|
||||
In that case, the differences between the true arrival times $(\tTrueArriv)_i$ and propagation delays $(\tProp)_i$ of the antennas can be related as
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:interantenna_t0}
|
||||
\phantom{.}
|
||||
\begin{aligned}
|
||||
\Delta (t'_0)_{ij}
|
||||
&\equiv (t'_0)_i - (t'_0)_j \\
|
||||
&= \left[ t_0 + (t_d)_i \right] - \left[ t_0 + (t_d)_j \right] \\
|
||||
%&= \left[ t_0 - t_0 \right] + \left[ (t_d)_i - (t_d)_j \right] \\
|
||||
&= (t_d)_i - (t_d)_j
|
||||
\Delta (\tTrueArriv)_{ij}
|
||||
&\equiv (\tTrueArriv)_i - (\tTrueArriv)_j \\
|
||||
&= \left[ \tTrueEmit + (\tProp)_i \right] - \left[ \tTrueEmit + (\tProp)_j \right] \\
|
||||
%&= \left[ \tTrueEmit - \tTrueEmit \right] + \left[ (\tProp)_i - (\tProp)_j \right] \\
|
||||
&= (\tProp)_i - (\tProp)_j
|
||||
%\\
|
||||
%&
|
||||
\equiv (\Delta t_d)_{ij}
|
||||
\equiv (\Delta \tProp)_{ij}
|
||||
\end{aligned}
|
||||
.
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
@ -107,28 +127,28 @@ In that case, the differences between the true arrival times $(t'_0)_i$ and prop
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
% mismatch into clock deviation
|
||||
Combining \eqref{eq:interantenna_t0} and \eqref{eq:transmitter2antenna_t0} then gives the relative clock mismatch $\Delta (t_c)_{ij}$ as
|
||||
Combining \eqref{eq:interantenna_t0} and \eqref{eq:transmitter2antenna_t0} then gives the relative clock mismatch $\Delta (\tClock)_{ij}$ as
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:synchro_mismatch_clocks}
|
||||
\phantom{.}
|
||||
\begin{aligned}
|
||||
\Delta (t_c)_{ij}
|
||||
&\equiv (t_c)_i - (t_c)_j \\
|
||||
&= \left[ (\tau_0)_i - (t'_0)_i \right] - \left[ (\tau_0)_j - (t'_0)_j \right] \\
|
||||
&= \left[ (\tau_0)_i - (\tau_0)_j \right] - \left[ (t'_0)_i - (t'_0)_j \right] \\
|
||||
&= \left[ (\tau_0)_i - (\tau_0)_j \right] - \Delta (t'_0)_{ij} \\
|
||||
&= \left[ (\tau_0)_i - (\tau_0)_j \right] - \Delta (t_d)_{ij} \\
|
||||
\Delta (\tClock)_{ij}
|
||||
&\equiv (\tClock)_i - (\tClock)_j \\
|
||||
&= \left[ (\tMeasArriv)_i - (\tTrueArriv)_i \right] - \left[ (\tMeasArriv)_j - (\tTrueArriv)_j \right] \\
|
||||
&= \left[ (\tMeasArriv)_i - (\tMeasArriv)_j \right] - \left[ (\tTrueArriv)_i - (\tTrueArriv)_j \right] \\
|
||||
&= \Delta (\tMeasArriv)_{ij} - \Delta (\tTrueArriv)_{ij} \\
|
||||
&= \Delta (\tMeasArriv)_{ij} - \Delta (\tProp)_{ij} \\
|
||||
\end{aligned}
|
||||
.
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
Thus, measuring $(\tau_0)_i$ and determining $(t_d)_i$ provides the synchronisation mismatch between the antennas.
|
||||
Thus, measuring $(\tMeasArriv)_i$ and determining $(\tProp)_i$ provides the synchronisation mismatch between the antennas.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
||||
% is relative
|
||||
As the mismatch is the difference between the antenna clock deviations, this scheme does not allow to uniquely attribute the mismatch to one of the clock deviations $(t_c)_i$.
|
||||
As the mismatch is the difference between the antenna clock deviations, this scheme does not allow to uniquely attribute the mismatch to one of the clock deviations $(\tClock)_i$.
|
||||
Instead, it only gives a relative synchronisation between the antennas.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
This can be resolved by knowledge on the $t_0$ of the transmitter.
|
||||
This can be resolved by knowledge on the $\tTrueEmit$ of the transmitter.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\bigskip
|
||||
|
@ -141,9 +161,9 @@ As \eqref{eq:synchro_mismatch_clocks} applies for any two antennas in the array,
|
|||
The mismatch terms for any two pairs of antennas sharing a single antenna $( (i,j), (j,k) )$ allows to find the closing mismatch term for $(i,k)$ since
|
||||
\begin{equation*}
|
||||
\label{eq:synchro_closing}
|
||||
\Delta (t_c)_{ij} + \Delta(t_c)_{jk} + \Delta(t_c)_{ki} = 0
|
||||
\Delta (\tClock)_{ij} + \Delta(\tClock)_{jk} + \Delta(\tClock)_{ki} = 0
|
||||
\end{equation*}
|
||||
Taking one antenna as the reference antenna with $(t_c)_r = 0$, the mismatches across the array can be determined by applying \eqref{eq:synchro_mismatch_clocks} over consecutive pairs of antennas and thus all clock deviations $(t_c)_i$.
|
||||
Taking one antenna as the reference antenna with $(\tClock)_r = 0$, the mismatches across the array can be determined by applying \eqref{eq:synchro_mismatch_clocks} over consecutive pairs of antennas and thus all clock deviations $(\tClock)_i$.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
||||
% floating offset, minimising total
|
||||
|
@ -151,9 +171,9 @@ Taking one antenna as the reference antenna with $(t_c)_r = 0$, the mismatches a
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% signals to send, and measure, (t'_0)_i.
|
||||
In the former, the mechanism of measuring $(\tau_0)_i$ from the signal has been deliberately left out.
|
||||
The nature of the beacon allows for different methods to determine $(\tau_0)_i$.\Todo{reword towards next sections?}
|
||||
% signals to send, and measure, (\tTrueArriv)_i.
|
||||
In the former, the mechanism of measuring $(\tMeasArriv)_i$ from the signal has been deliberately left out.
|
||||
The nature of the beacon allows for different methods to determine $(\tMeasArriv)_i$.\Todo{reword towards next sections?}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -212,25 +232,25 @@ The strength of the beacon at each antenna must therefore be tuned such to both
|
|||
% continuous -> period multiplicity
|
||||
The continuity of the beacon poses a different issue.
|
||||
Because the beacon must be periodic, differentiating between consecutive periods is not possible using the beacon alone.
|
||||
The $t_0$ term describing the transmitter time in \eqref{eq:transmitter2antenna_t0} is no longer uniquely defined,
|
||||
The $\tTrueEmit$ term describing the transmitter time in \eqref{eq:transmitter2antenna_t0} is no longer uniquely defined,
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\phantom{,}
|
||||
\label{eq:period_multiplicity}
|
||||
t_0 = \left[ \frac{\varphi_0}{2\pi} + k\right] T
|
||||
\tTrueEmit = \left[ \frac{\pTrueEmit}{2\pi} + k\right] T
|
||||
,
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
with $\varphi_0$ the phase of the beacon at time $t_0$, $T$ the period of the beacon and $k \in \mathbb{R}$ unknown.
|
||||
with $\pTrueEmit$ the phase of the beacon at time $\tTrueEmit$, $T$ the period of the beacon and $k \in \mathbb{Z}$ unknown.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
||||
This affects \eqref{eq:transmitter2antenna_t0}, thus changing the synchronisation\eqref{eq:synchro_mismatch_clocks} to
|
||||
This affects \eqref{eq:transmitter2antenna_t0}, thus changing the synchronisation mismatches in \eqref{eq:synchro_mismatch_clocks} to
|
||||
\begin{equation}
|
||||
\label{eq:synchro_mismatch_clocks_periodic}
|
||||
\phantom{.}
|
||||
\begin{aligned}
|
||||
\Delta (t_c)_{ij}
|
||||
&\equiv (t_c)_i - (t_c)_j \\
|
||||
&= \left[ (\tau_0)_i - (\tau_0)_j \right] - \Delta (t'_0)_{ij} \\
|
||||
&= \left[ (\tau_0)_i - (\tau_0)_j \right] - \Delta (t_d)_{ij} + \Delta k_{ij} T\\
|
||||
\Delta (\tClock)_{ij}
|
||||
&\equiv (\tClock)_i - (\tClock)_j \\
|
||||
&= \Delta (\tMeasArriv)_{ij} - \Delta (\tTrueArriv)_{ij} \\
|
||||
&= \Delta (\tMeasArriv)_{ij} - \Delta (\tProp)_{ij} + \Delta k_{ij} T\\
|
||||
\end{aligned}
|
||||
.
|
||||
\end{equation}
|
||||
|
@ -243,12 +263,12 @@ There are two ways to lift this period degeneracy.
|
|||
First, if the timescale of the beacon is much longer than the estimated accuracy of another timing mechanism (such as \gls{GNSS}),
|
||||
one can be confident to have the correct period.
|
||||
In AERA \cite{PierreAuger:2015aqe} for example, the total beacon repeats only after $\sim 1 \us$ (see Figure~\ref{fig:beacon:pa}).
|
||||
With an estimated accuracy of the \gls{GNSS} below $50 \ns$ the correct beacon period can be determined, resulting in a unique $t_0$ transmit time\todo{reword}.
|
||||
With an estimated accuracy of the \gls{GNSS} below $50 \ns$ the correct beacon period can be determined, resulting in a unique $\tTrueEmit$ transmit time\todo{reword}.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
|
||||
% lifing period multiplicity -> short timescale counting +
|
||||
Another scheme is using an additional discrete signal to declare a unique $t_0$.
|
||||
It relies on the ability of counting how many beacon periods have passed since the discrete signal has been recorded.
|
||||
Another scheme is using an additional discrete signal to declare a unique $\tTrueEmit$.
|
||||
This relies on the ability of counting how many beacon periods have passed since the discrete signal has been recorded.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{beacon/auger/1512.02216.figure2.beacon_beat.png}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue