mirror of
				https://gitlab.science.ru.nl/mthesis-edeboone/m.internship-documentation.git
				synced 2025-10-26 09:46:34 +01:00 
			
		
		
		
	Thesis: Introduction: WuotD
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									eb02e72fe3
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						b9b2dedbdc
					
				
					 1 changed files with 84 additions and 30 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -12,7 +12,7 @@ | |||
| \label{sec:introduction} | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| % Intro Cosmic Ray | ||||
| In the beginning of the 20th century, various types of radiation were discovered. | ||||
| In the beginning of the $\mathrm{20^{th}}$~century, various types of radiation were discovered. | ||||
| With the balloonflight of Victor Hess \Todo{ref} in \Todo{year}, one type was determined to come from beyond the atmosphere and named ``Cosmic Rays''. | ||||
| With many discoveries following, the field of (astro-)particle physics evolved. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
|  | @ -27,11 +27,11 @@ For such radio arrays, the analyses require an accurate timing of signals within | |||
| Generally, \gls{GNSS} is used to synchronise the detectors. | ||||
| However, advanced analyses require an even higher accuracy. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| In this thesis, methods (and their limits) to obtain this accuracy for radio arrays are investigated. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| \section{Cosmic Particles}%<<<<<< | ||||
| %<<< | ||||
| \label{sec:crs} | ||||
| Particles from outer space, | ||||
| Particle type, | ||||
|  | @ -45,10 +45,11 @@ There is a variety of extra terrestrial particles with which the Earth is bombar | |||
| These can be classified into three main types: charged nuclei (typically protons $Z=1$ up to iron $Z=26$), photons and neutrinos, each with different propagation effects. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| The charged nuclei are the bulk of the measured particles. | ||||
| They do not point back to their sources because they are deflected by magnetic fields due to being charged. | ||||
| The various magnetic fields that they travel through deflect\Todo{word} them due to their charge. | ||||
| They do not point back to their sources because of this. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| Photons do not suffer from being charged, and thus have the potential to identify their sources. | ||||
| However, they can be absorbed and created by multiple mechanisms.\Todo{rephrase} | ||||
| However, they can be absorbed and created by multiple mechanisms.\Todo{rephrase/expand} | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| Finally, neutrino's interact weakly, thus pointing back to their sources as well. | ||||
| Unfortunately, this weak interaction also troubles the detection of the neutrino's.\Todo{rephrase} | ||||
|  | @ -69,13 +70,13 @@ Note that cosmic rays are deemed\Todo{rephrase} to be charged nuclei. | |||
| 
 | ||||
| % Energy | ||||
| Cosmic rays span a large range of energy as illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:cr_flux}. | ||||
| The acceleration of cosmic rays is thought to occur in highly energetic regions | ||||
| The acceleration of cosmic rays is thought to occur in highly energetic regions\Todo{expand} | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Using the charged nuclei, an argument can be made to distinguish two types of sources. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| Being charged, the nuclei will gyrate in magnetic fields. | ||||
| With an approximate size of $ $\Todo{size} and an average magnetic field of $5\mathrm{\;\mu G}$\Todo{}, the Milky Way can only contain particles up to an energy of about $10^{16}\eV$\Todo{fill}. | ||||
| With an approximate size of $ $\Todo{size} and an average magnetic field of $5\mathrm{\;\mu G}$\Todo{}, the Milky Way can only contain particles up to an energy of about $10^{17}\eV$\Todo{fill}. | ||||
| Still, particles with higher energies have been observed (see Figure~\ref{fig:}). | ||||
| These higher energy particles must thus come from beyond our galaxy. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
|  | @ -92,18 +93,23 @@ Xmax?, | |||
| Radio emission, | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| \hrule | ||||
| When a particle with a high enough energy comes into contact with the atmosphere, secondary particles are generated, forming an air shower. | ||||
| When a particle with an energy above $1\;\TeV$ comes into contact with the atmosphere, secondary particles are generated, forming an air shower. | ||||
| This air shower consists of a cascade of interactions producing more particles that subsequently undergo further interactions. | ||||
| Thus, the number of particles rapidly increases further down the air shower. | ||||
| Figure~\ref{fig:airshower:depth} shows the number of particles as a function of atmospheric depth where $0\mathrm{\; g/cm^2}$ corresponds with the top of the atmosphere. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| An important feature that allows to statistically discriminate photons from protons and iron nuclei is the atmospheric depth at which this number of particles reaches its maximum, called $\Xmax$. | ||||
| Part of this is explained by the depth of first interaction. | ||||
| Due to the higher charge of heavy nuclei, they interact earlier in the atmosphere. | ||||
| This happens until the energy is spread out\Todo{word} enough that the number of interactions decreases. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| The particle content of an air shower is dependent on the initial particle type. | ||||
| Protons (and other nuclei) have access to hadronic interaction channels (pions, kaons, etc.)\Todo{ref?} through which most energy is passed. | ||||
| Figure~\ref{fig:airshower:depth} shows the number of particles as a function of atmospheric depth where $0\;\mathrm{g/cm^2}$ corresponds with the top of the atmosphere. | ||||
| The atmospheric depth at which this number of particles reaches its maximum is called $\Xmax$. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| In Figure~\ref{fig:airshower:depth} the \Xmax is different for a photon, a proton and iron. | ||||
| Typically, heavy nuclei have their first interaction higher up in the atmosphere than protons, with photons penetrating the atmosphere even further. | ||||
| Therefore, measurements of $\Xmax$ allow to statistically discriminate between photons, protons and iron nuclei. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| The initial particle type also influences the particle content of an air shower. | ||||
| Protons (and other nuclei) have access to hadronic interaction channels (such as pions, kaons, etc.)\Todo{ref?} through which most energy is passed. | ||||
| In turn, the resulting air showers contain a large hadronic component.\Todo{check wording} | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| In contrast, an initial photon cannot interact hadronicly, meaning its energy is dumped into the electromagnetic part of the air shower. | ||||
|  | @ -111,7 +117,9 @@ In contrast, an initial photon cannot interact hadronicly, meaning its energy is | |||
| Finally, any charged pions created in the air shower will decay into muons while still in the atmosphere. | ||||
| This muonic component is a reliable part to measure.\Todo{rephrase} | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| These different components have a different width.\Todo{rephrase} | ||||
| The hadronic component is greatly collimated, while the electromagnetic component. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| \begin{figure}%<<< airshower:depth | ||||
| 	\centering | ||||
|  | @ -123,44 +131,85 @@ This muonic component is a reliable part to measure.\Todo{rephrase} | |||
| 	\label{fig:airshower:depth} | ||||
| \end{figure}%>>> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| % Radio measurements | ||||
| Processes in an air showers also generate radiation that can be picked up as coherent radio signals. | ||||
| %% Geo Synchro | ||||
| Due to the magnetic field of the Earth, the electrons in the air shower generate radiation. | ||||
| Termed geomagnetic emission in Figure~\ref{fig:airshower:polarisation}, this has a polarisation that is dependent on the magnetic field vector $B$ and the air shower velocity $v$. | ||||
| \Todo{expand?} | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| %% Askaryan / Charge excess | ||||
| An additional mechanism emitting radiation was first theorised by Askaryan\Todo{ref}. | ||||
| Due to the large inertia of the positively charged ions with respect to their light, negatively charged electrons, a negative charge excess is created. | ||||
| In turn, this generates radiation that is polarised radially towards the shower axis (see Figure~\ref{fig:airshower:polarisation}). | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| %% Cherenkov ring | ||||
| The relativistic speeds of the particles cause any radiation that is produced in the air shower to be forward beamed along the shower axis. | ||||
| Additionally, the shower travels faster than the speed of light in the atmosphere. | ||||
| This generates an | ||||
| The detection of the radio signals is limited to an | ||||
| This is limited by the so-called Cherenkov angle. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| \begin{figure}%<<< airshower:polarisation | ||||
| 	\centering | ||||
| 	\begin{subfigure}{0.47\textwidth} | ||||
| 		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{airshower/airshower_radio_polarisation_geomagnetic.png}% | ||||
| 		\caption{ | ||||
| 			Geomagnetic emission | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| 		\label{fig:airshower:polarisation:geomagnetic} | ||||
| 	\end{subfigure} | ||||
| 	\hfill | ||||
| 	\begin{subfigure}{0.47\textwidth} | ||||
| 		\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{airshower/airshower_radio_polarisation_askaryan.png}% | ||||
| 		\caption{ | ||||
| 			Askaryan or charge-excess emission | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| 		\label{fig:airshower:polarisation:askaryan} | ||||
| 	\end{subfigure} | ||||
| 	\caption{ | ||||
| 		From \protect \cite{Schoorlemmer:2012xpa} \protect\cite{Huege:2017bqv} | ||||
| 		\protect \Todo{Krijn?} | ||||
| 		Radio Emission mechanisms (left: geomagnetic, right: charge-excess) | ||||
| 		Radio Emission mechanisms: \subref{fig:airshower:polarisation:geomagnetic} geomagnetic and \subref{fig:airshower:polarisation:askaryan} charge-excess) | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| 	\label{fig:airshower:polarisation} | ||||
| \end{figure}%>>>>>> | ||||
| \subsection{Experiments}%<<< | ||||
| \label{sec:detectors} | ||||
| %>>>>>> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| %\subsection{Experiments}%<<< | ||||
| %\label{sec:detectors} | ||||
| \bigskip | ||||
| At the very highest energy, the flux is in the order of one particle per square kilometer per century (see Figure~\ref{fig:cr_flux}). | ||||
| To gather decent statistics at these highest energies on a practical timescale, observatories therefore have to span huge areas. | ||||
| Observatories therefore have to span huge areas to gather decent statistics at these highest energies on a practical timescale. | ||||
| In recent and upcoming experiments, such as \gls{Auger}, \gls{GRAND} or \gls{LOFAR}, the approach is typically to instrument an area with a sparse grid of detectors to detect the generated air shower. | ||||
| With distances up to $1.5\;\mathrm{km}$ (\gls{Auger}), the detectors therefore have to operate in a self-sufficient manner\Todo{word} with only wireless communication channels. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| The earliest  | ||||
| Standalone detectors typically receive their timing from a \gls{GNSS}. | ||||
| Previously, for timing of water-Cherenkov detectors, this timing accuracy was better than the resolved data\Todo{rephrase}. | ||||
| Even for the first analyses of radio data, this was sufficient. | ||||
| However, for advanced analyses such as radio interferometry, the timing accuracy must be improved. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| \hrule | ||||
| Standalone devices, | ||||
| \gls*{Auger}, | ||||
| AugerPrime RD, | ||||
| \gls*{GRAND}, | ||||
| \gls*{LOFAR}?, | ||||
| % Structure summary | ||||
| In this thesis, a solution to enhance the timing accuracy of air shower radio detectors is worked out\Todo{word}. | ||||
| First, introductions to radio interferometry and waveform analysis are given in Chapters~\ref{sec:interferometry}~and~\ref{sec:waveform}. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| %>>>>>> | ||||
| \section{Radio Interferometry} | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| \cleardoublepage | ||||
| \chapter{Air Shower Radio Interferometry} | ||||
| \label{sec:interferometry} | ||||
| The radio signals emitted from the air shower can be recorded by radio antennas. | ||||
| The radio signals emitted by the air shower (see Section~\ref{sec:airshowers}) can be recorded by radio antennas. | ||||
| An array of radio antennas can be used as an interferometer. | ||||
| Therefore, air showers can be analysed using radio interferometry. | ||||
| \\ | ||||
| % | ||||
| Unlike, astronomical interferometry, the source of the signal is closeby. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Unlike, astronomical interferometry, the source of the signal is closeby, therefore | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| \begin{figure} | ||||
|  | @ -202,6 +251,8 @@ Unlike, astronomical interferometry, the source of the signal is closeby, theref | |||
| 	\label{fig:trace_overlap} | ||||
| \end{figure} | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| \begin{figure} | ||||
| 	\centering | ||||
| 	\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{2006.10348/fig03_b.png}% | ||||
|  | @ -234,4 +285,7 @@ Need reference system with better accuracy to constrain current mechanism (Figur | |||
| %	\label{fig:reference-clock} | ||||
| %\end{figure} | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| \end{document} | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue