Initialise STEP-UP interview presentation

presentations/2023-03-13_step_up_interview/Makefile

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+# vim:ft=make
+-include config.mk
+
+.PHONY: all clean dist-clean
+
+### Variables
+MAIN_SRC  ?= main.tex
+TEXENGINE ?= latexmk --pdf
+
+MAIN_TARGET = $(patsubst %.tex,%.pdf,$(MAIN_SRC))
+
+### Targets
+all: $(MAIN_TARGET)
+
+dist: all clean
+
+$(MAIN_TARGET): $(MAIN_SRC)
+	$(TEXENGINE) $^
+
+dist-clean: clean
+	@rm -vf *.pdf *.eps *.dvi *.ps
+
+clean:
+	@rm -vf *.dat *.log *.out *.aux *.nav *.snm *.toc *.vrb *~ *.fls *.fdb_latexmk *-blx.bib *.bbl *.blg *.run.xml

presentations/2023-03-13_step_up_interview/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Interview for grant to do PhD in Paris
+
+length: 10minutes
+
+
+```
+I hear from colleagues that there is a strong pressure (3 candidates for PhDs at LPNHE, and at most one candidate will be selected, if he is very good), but the fact that you passed the first stage means that they consider your academic records acceptable.
+In principle for the oral examination the research part is the most important and you may then make a (positive) difference.
+
+Hence it is critical that this is very well prepared.
+The key here is to be very pedagogical, show that you understand the physics background of the work project, and how your work (past and future) fits in this. I think it would be great if we can prepare that together with Harm+me+you to increase your chances.
+My suggestion is that you prepare a few slides (less than 10 given the amount of time), send them to us and we comment them. Once we reach a good version then we do at least one (ideally 2) rehearsals.
+We can surely feed you with input for the slides (more details on the best practices for these kind of short presentations or details on the proposed PhD subject) to start with.
+```

presentations/2023-03-13_step_up_interview/config.mk

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+MAIN_SRC=2023-STEP_UP.tex