mirror of
https://gitlab.science.ru.nl/mthesis-edeboone/m.internship-documentation.git
synced 2024-11-22 15:03:35 +01:00
Thesis: fix reference errors
This commit is contained in:
parent
624c6a31b6
commit
f276cc0a32
2 changed files with 4 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ Of course, like the pulse method, the ability to measure the beacon's sine waves
|
||||||
To quantify this comparison in terms of \gls{SNR},
|
To quantify this comparison in terms of \gls{SNR},
|
||||||
we define the signal level to be the amplitude of the frequency spectrum at the beacon's frequency determined by \gls{DTFT} (the orange line in Figure~\ref{fig:sine:snr_definition}),
|
we define the signal level to be the amplitude of the frequency spectrum at the beacon's frequency determined by \gls{DTFT} (the orange line in Figure~\ref{fig:sine:snr_definition}),
|
||||||
and the noise level as the scaled \gls{RMS} of all amplitudes in the noise band determined by \gls{FFT} (blue line in Figure~\ref{fig:sine:snr_definition}).
|
and the noise level as the scaled \gls{RMS} of all amplitudes in the noise band determined by \gls{FFT} (blue line in Figure~\ref{fig:sine:snr_definition}).
|
||||||
Since gaussian noise has Rayleigh distributed amplitudes (see Figure~\ref{fig:noise:pdf:amplitude} in Appendix~\ref{sec:phasor_distributions}), this \gls{RMS} is scaled by $1/\sqrt{2\pi}$.
|
Since gaussian noise has Rayleigh distributed amplitudes (see Figure~\ref{fig:phasor_sum:pdf:amplitude} in Appendix~\ref{sec:phasor_distributions}), this \gls{RMS} is scaled by $1/\sqrt{2\pi}$.
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
% longer traces
|
% longer traces
|
||||||
However, for sine waves, an additional method to increase the \gls{SNR} is available.
|
However, for sine waves, an additional method to increase the \gls{SNR} is available.
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -155,8 +155,8 @@ The distance between the antenna and the transmitter results in a phase offset w
|
||||||
} %>>>
|
} %>>>
|
||||||
The beacon signal was recorded over a longer time ($10240\,\mathrm{samples}$), to be able to distinguish the beacon and air shower later in the analysis.
|
The beacon signal was recorded over a longer time ($10240\,\mathrm{samples}$), to be able to distinguish the beacon and air shower later in the analysis.
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
The final waveform of an antenna (see Figure~\ref{fig:single:annotated_full_waveform}) was then constructed by adding its beacon and air shower waveforms and band-passing with relevant frequencies (here $30$ and $80\MHz$ are taken by default).
|
The final waveform of an antenna (see Figure~\ref{fig:single:proton}) was then constructed by adding its beacon and air shower waveforms and band-passing with relevant frequencies (here $30$ and $80\MHz$ are taken by default).
|
||||||
Of course, a gaussian white noise component is introduced to the waveform as a simple noise model (see Figure~\ref{fig:sine:time_accuracy} for a treatise on the timing accuracy of a sine beacon).
|
Of course, a gaussian white noise component is introduced to the waveform as a simple noise model (see Figure~\ref{fig:sine:snr_time_resolution} for a treatise on the timing accuracy of a sine beacon).
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure}% <<<
|
\begin{figure}% <<<
|
||||||
|
@ -172,12 +172,10 @@ Of course, a gaussian white noise component is introduced to the waveform as a s
|
||||||
\begin{figure}% <<<
|
\begin{figure}% <<<
|
||||||
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.49\textwidth}
|
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.49\textwidth}
|
||||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ZH_simulation/ba_measure_beacon_phase.py.A74.no_mask.zoomed.pdf}
|
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ZH_simulation/ba_measure_beacon_phase.py.A74.no_mask.zoomed.pdf}
|
||||||
\label{fig:single:annotated_full_waveform}
|
|
||||||
\end{subfigure}
|
\end{subfigure}
|
||||||
\hfill
|
\hfill
|
||||||
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.49\textwidth}
|
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.49\textwidth}
|
||||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ZH_simulation/ba_measure_beacon_phase.py.A74.fourier.pdf}
|
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ZH_simulation/ba_measure_beacon_phase.py.A74.fourier.pdf}
|
||||||
\label{fig:single:fourier}
|
|
||||||
\end{subfigure}
|
\end{subfigure}
|
||||||
\caption{
|
\caption{
|
||||||
\textit{Left:}
|
\textit{Left:}
|
||||||
|
@ -204,7 +202,7 @@ Moreover, it falls in the order of magnitude of clock defects that were found in
|
||||||
% separate air shower from beacon
|
% separate air shower from beacon
|
||||||
To correctly recover the beacon from the waveform, it must be separated from the air shower.
|
To correctly recover the beacon from the waveform, it must be separated from the air shower.
|
||||||
Typically, a trigger sets the location of the airshower signal in the waveform.
|
Typically, a trigger sets the location of the airshower signal in the waveform.
|
||||||
In our case, the airshower signal is located at $t=500\ns$ (see Figure~\ref{fig:single:annotated_full_waveform}).
|
In our case, the airshower signal is located at $t=500\ns$ (see Figure~\ref{fig:single:proton}).
|
||||||
Since the beacon can be recorded for much longer than the air shower signal, we mask a window of $500$ samples around the maximum of the trace as the air shower's signal.
|
Since the beacon can be recorded for much longer than the air shower signal, we mask a window of $500$ samples around the maximum of the trace as the air shower's signal.
|
||||||
% measure beacon phase, remove distance phase
|
% measure beacon phase, remove distance phase
|
||||||
The remaining waveform is fed into a \gls{DTFT} \eqref{eq:fourier:dtft} to measure the beacon's phase $\pMeas$ and amplitude.
|
The remaining waveform is fed into a \gls{DTFT} \eqref{eq:fourier:dtft} to measure the beacon's phase $\pMeas$ and amplitude.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue